Stephanie Zvan is an ignorant bully, but she's also absolutely right that the stuff here is vile, stupid, bollox: http://bit.ly/WdVprB
-
@PhilosophyExp Not that I haven't said stupid things myself before. Who hasn't? it's worth to make the effort not to engage in tit-for-tat
@AdrianaHeguy INot tit for tat. I wanted to be clear the fact I'm defending Zvan doesn't mean I think her behaviour generally is justified.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Yes, but you could have said: "I often disagree with Z, but this stuff is truly vile"...etc -
@AdrianaHeguy Sure, but the issue isn't that I disagree with her. I disagree with you about this, but I'd never call you a bully, etc. -
@PhilosophyExp So you think she *is* an ignorant bully. But do you have to say it? My point is: not conducive to discussion -
@AdrianaHeguy But it might be conducive to making the point that I'm not justifying a systematic pattern of behaviour. -
@PhilosophyExp Perhaps...my bet is that it's simply not helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.