Trolley problem fun. "Should You Kill the Fat Man?" (with new charts): http://bit.ly/vGv84I
-
@petehague
@PhilosophyExp I think persisting in any policy in face of evidence to contrary is morally wrong, so would I have to tick both!?
@OrwellUpgraded @petehague If that's the argument, then you'd have to claim that the final torture scenario was impossible (couldn't exist).
-
-
@PhilosophyExp @petehague Don't think we have understood each other but 140 chars vs limits of language doesn't help. -
@OrwellUpgraded @petehague Yeah, I know. The 140 chars makes this sort of conversation almost impossible. It really needs face to face. -
@PhilosophyExp @petehague AGW is example. To persist in aiding everyone's demise despite so much evidence, to me seems principally immoral.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.