Good lord, didn't this cause the parents huge distress? http://bit.ly/118zRlO
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp it was considered very sentimental, a lasting way to preserve the memory of the child (esp when infant mortality was high).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @maldorora
@maldorora Sure, but I meant the process of setting up the photo, etc (given how long & involved that would have been back then).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp 2/2 But sometimes funerals were delayed just to get the photographer over to take a picture (ew...).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @maldorora
@maldorora So basically people were just more familiar with death, grief, etc? (Did you study this stuff - or just interested?)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp 2/2 the body would be laid out(hence "funeral parlor").the civil war&industrial age mortality escalated familiarity of death.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@maldorora Thx. Interesting. If your funeralia collection makes it online, let me know!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.