@PhilosophyExp I cannot come up with a prescription that isn't itself oppressive.
clear. Did you see this recent piece of research? (I don't trust it, but it's interesting): http://huff.to/10KL3F4
-
-
-
@drjenpierce some pornographers they considered to be "reputable". But even that list was problematic, eg: http://bit.ly/10KLZta -
@PhilosophyExp there is something mildly hilarious about that link. -
@drjenpierce You mean because those things should be very obvious? -
@PhilosophyExp because if the details that make them reputable. No make up. No waxing. It starts to become absurd. -
@drjenpierce There was a lot of that sort of talk at the conference - trying to tiptoe around the problem of objectification, of course. -
@PhilosophyExp anytime you try to isolate a definition it becomes absurd. -
@drjenpierce Yup. And ultimately, of course, that's why MacKinnon's approach is always likely to be dangerously prescriptive. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp and even in "legit" theater/tv/film environments I've witnessed coercive and oppressive practices yet as you say -
@drjenpierce Yeah. It's just very difficult. I attended a feminst pornography day confernce a couple of years ago. There they listed...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I took a class in which we studied sex workers. I was made permanently ambivalent by the experience.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp a) it's HuffPo so suspect, b) I would say it is accurate based on personal experiences of a similar realmThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I've seen similar anecdotal and research based studies. Yet Lovelace's testimony attests to coercion in the industryThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.