Reading MacKinnonn is a pleasure, not because she's right - she isn't - but because she's clever, she knows things & she's interesting.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp isn't that she's right about a lot of things but very wrong about a few very important things?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drjenpierce
@drjenpierce particular variants of feminism is very strong. It's just it's very much more difficult to construct a persuasive alternative.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I find her to be descriptively engaging but prescriptively disturbing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drjenpierce
@drjenpierce Yes, I have the same feeling. But I'm re-reading "Towards a Feminist Theory of the State" for first time in 20 years,1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I confess I have not retread her in about that time. I was intrigued, beguiled, then ultimately disillusioned.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drjenpierce
@drjenpierce I get the impression that's not an uncommon trajectory with MacKinnon. Still, at the moment, I'm enjoying re-reading it.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp MacKinnon, Dworkin. Et al. Yet...complicated.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@drjenpierce ultimately I think they fail because of the definitional problem. Plus, the empirical data about the effects of porn isn't
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.