@PhilosophyExp I'm in the mood to organize, define, and clarify this morning. :P
That should have been repeatED measures. @badrescher will be able to tell me if I've made any similar egregious errors in the piece itself!
-
-
-
@badrescher Thanks! Nothing wrong with a bit of defining and organizing. :) -
@PhilosophyExp Or, in my case, just babbling? I do that, you know... -
@badrescher All the best people babble. It's a sign of an over-active mind (or, in my case, having no idea what I'm talking about.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp In psych, we like to differentiate between design & stats by calling the design w/in subjects and one of the... 1/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp statistical tests might be "repeated-measures ANOVA", but those are just conveniences. :) 2/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I'd describe your first example as a one-group pretest-posttest design that would be analyzed using a dependent t-test. ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp BTW, I think you've come up w/rather nice ways to solve sticky problems (like order effects) and even benefit from them.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.