latter is paid...while the former is kept...", which is wildly offensive (and yes, she kind of means it literally).
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp When was this written? The argument could be made that that may once have been true, but not for QUITE some time - certainly3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InsomniacXIII
@InsomniacXIII The internal logic sets it against a Marxist class analysis - so that's what she's critictizing there.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Wow, I see what you mean. Intelligent argument in and of itself, but built on a flawed premise.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @InsomniacXIII
@InsomniacXIII Exactly. The argument aims at internal consistency - and it's undeniably elegant - but, as you say, based on a false premise.
5:01 PM - 7 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.