latter is paid...while the former is kept...", which is wildly offensive (and yes, she kind of means it literally).
-
@PhilosophyExp When was this written? The argument could be made that that may once have been true, but not for QUITE some time - certainly
@InsomniacXIII The internal logic sets it against a Marxist class analysis - so that's what she's critictizing there.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Wow, I see what you mean. Intelligent argument in and of itself, but built on a flawed premise. -
@InsomniacXIII Exactly. The argument aims at internal consistency - and it's undeniably elegant - but, as you say, based on a false premise.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.