@PhilosophyExp thanks for the RT. If only it hadn't provoked such an angry response!
-
-
-
@SteveCooke Have you had angry responses to your piece? (I got some pushback for calling the Daily Mail piece hysterical, so I'm curious.) -
@PhilosophyExp I've spent the morning defending making any claims about relative harms. Others think even using the eg. of abuse was wrong. -
@SteveCooke Ah right. In fairness that is something that would need to be defended, I think. -
@PhilosophyExp I also think there's a wacking great dislike of Dawkins & his style of argument that colours reactions. -
@SteveCooke Absolutely. One strongly suspects that people's reaction are colored by their existing views about Dawkins.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@townsendoutdoor@SteveCooke it's worrying when people stifle debate, it's "the thin end of a very thick wedge"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp@stevecooke@SteveCooke - sociobiological defense responses activated. Reason on hold. This is what happens in apes. -
@timothygmd I get to blame genetics rather than flawed reasoning? Damn, that's so much more forgivably deterministic! -
@SteveCooke - neurobiology demonstrates that much reasoning is rationalization of the subconsious, genetics contributes. -
@timothygmd I've no doubt our biological impulses push us in all sorts of ways, but I'm not yet prepared to succumb to determinism! -
@SteveCooke - we all hate the chains of our biology, but understanding is the hope for greater freedom and increasing humanity. -
@timothygmd hate's a bit strong! We can have our desires shaped by biological impulse & still be rational moral agents. -
@SteveCooke@timothygmd -fair, I can be prone to hyperbole. 2nd part depends on definition of "we". Unless you include the subconscious, no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.