@philosophyexp Consistent replies in my case, but I'd done it before. And there's a misspelling in the front page (exercize)
I'm still interested to see whether my followers are savvy enough to avoid the perils of decision framing. http://bit.ly/Q35cS6 #psychology
-
-
-
@el_masse_xy Thx. Glad you were consistent. Error corrected (that'll teach me to guess when it comes to US spellings!).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp I was consistent, don't know if I was ethical or not...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp In real-life we never know exact outcomes. 200 will survive means 200+. 400 will die means 400+. I was found "consistent".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Using an epidemic as the example (it's not scientific to predict loss) - justifies the experiment more than gives an insight.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.