@Questingrat I understand that sometimes the impulse takes over (especially on the internet). But then to flag it up afterwards...
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I still don't think that's categorically Atheist. Googling Internet rage returns whole pages. I agree that's baffling, btw5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat (because of deindividuation or whatever), but not unreasonable to call it football violence. 2/22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Just not sure this is an Atheist impulse instead of a net one.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat Though there is a wider argument to be had - which we were getting into - about how the impulse is valorized.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Again I'd say not an atheist set issue, but much broader set. But I think impulse to defeat and demean your foe biological.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat Agreed. But it becomes an atheist issue if it's true that a certan style of atheism gains a lot of media traction, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp interesting, are you implying that all atheists have some sort of responsibility towards each other?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat I think I'm just saying that communities - virtual or otherwise - have norms of behaviour that *can* become entrenched.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp no problem there, though I'd retreat from referring to atheists as a community (as opposed to communities of atheists)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Questingrat Yes, the notion of "community" would have to be specified at a high level of abstraction to make sense in this context.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.