to crush the naively religious. (It's not difficult to crush the naively irreligious, as it happens).
-
@PhilosophyExp not that that justifies it, mind you.
@Questingrat then though it's true that it's driven by biological, psychological stuff, it's no longer the whole story (if it ever was...).
-
-
@PhilosophyExp *grin* have we made a mountain from a mole hill, are you just saying you don't get aggressive atheists? -
@Questingrat Twitter is utterly hopeless for this sort of thing. :) If you read this, you'll see I agree with you: http://bit.ly/RlecQG -
@PhilosophyExp I think I see where you're going. In a sense, the net can provide a "Niebor"ian society to ingrain aggressive traits on 1
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.