to crush the naively religious. (It's not difficult to crush the naively irreligious, as it happens).
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Why label this the atheist aggressive instinct & not just an atheist displaying the Internet aggressive instinct?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat "Impulse" not "instinct" - that makes a (big) difference.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Ok, but doesn't change my question. Internet is filled with knee jerk rage. Is "Gamer aggressive impulse" categorically diff?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat I understand that sometimes the impulse takes over (especially on the internet). But then to flag it up afterwards...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp I still don't think that's categorically Atheist. Googling Internet rage returns whole pages. I agree that's baffling, btw5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat (because of deindividuation or whatever), but not unreasonable to call it football violence. 2/22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Just not sure this is an Atheist impulse instead of a net one.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Questingrat
@Questingrat Though there is a wider argument to be had - which we were getting into - about how the impulse is valorized.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
@PhilosophyExp Again I'd say not an atheist set issue, but much broader set. But I think impulse to defeat and demean your foe biological.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Questingrat In other words, if people begin to identify in terms of a particular style of engagement, if particular norms, etc., arise...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.