to crush the naively religious. (It's not difficult to crush the naively irreligious, as it happens).
-
@PhilosophyExp Again I'd say not an atheist set issue, but much broader set. But I think impulse to defeat and demean your foe biological.
@Questingrat Agreed. But it becomes an atheist issue if it's true that a certan style of atheism gains a lot of media traction, etc.
-
-
@PhilosophyExp interesting, are you implying that all atheists have some sort of responsibility towards each other? -
@Questingrat I think I'm just saying that communities - virtual or otherwise - have norms of behaviour that *can* become entrenched. -
@PhilosophyExp no problem there, though I'd retreat from referring to atheists as a community (as opposed to communities of atheists) -
@Questingrat Yes, the notion of "community" would have to be specified at a high level of abstraction to make sense in this context.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.