@PhilosophyExp Hmm. Maybe you're being called a brainless cunt because you're a brainless cunt. Why does this need to be heard?
I'm not endorsing (all of) that article. But author is currently being targetted by people with big platforms, so she needs to be heard.
-
-
-
@JeanKazez@PhilosophyExp - Such language is NEVER justified, it debases the writer/speaker even more than the intended target. -
@timothygmd Seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp She was supported by someone with a big platform. It can't be that's OK, but criticism from a big platform is taboo. -
@JeanKazez@PhilosophyExp I often wonder about that. Rebecca v Stef; evil. Dawkins v Rebecca; no prob. Hmm. -
@OpheliaBenson I don't buy power differential worries anyway. In philo world, little people attack big & vice versa. Not an issue. -
@JeanKazez Interesting. JS and RB kind of have me convinced it can be an issue - because, you know, trying to take criticism on board, etc. -
@OpheliaBenson When under attack by J. Coyne many moons ago I never once thought "not fair, he's too big". I think most little fish are...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhilosophyExp Fair enough too. It was interesting and lends perspective I think. Thanks.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.