"Trans rights don’t narrow the scope of acceptable gender expressions for cis people; they inevitably broaden them." I wrote about the Trump admin's war on workplace protections for gender non-conforming people, and why TERFs can go fuck off into a ditch:https://gen.medium.com/the-trump-administrations-onslaught-against-trans-rights-continues-173b1c0bcc13 …
-
-
Replying to @sadydoyle
“The body has been for women in capitalist society what the factory has been for male waged workers,” Federici writes in Caliban, “the primary ground of their exploitation and resistance.” But fuck those materialist TERF-witches eh Sady?http://inthesetimes.com/article/21592/capitalism-witches-women-witch-hunting-sylvia-federici-caliban …
4 replies 39 retweets 238 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
LOL at the idea that a trans woman's body is not a site of exploitation and/or resistance
19 replies 4 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @sadydoyle
I’m talking about the right to name the specificity of female people’s bodies as the reason for the oppression of women.
3 replies 11 retweets 188 likes -
Replying to @janeclarejones
The right to be wrong in public? Yeah, people do that. No-one has to listen to you doing it, though.
21 replies 0 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @sadydoyle @janeclarejones
why is she wrong though? You don’t say. If we are not oppressed on the basis of our bodies, what is the reason historically, that females have been oppressed by males?
2 replies 6 retweets 124 likes -
Replying to @berthadalziel @sadydoyle
Can you ask her is she thinks Engels was a TERF?
2 replies 0 retweets 50 likes -
Or Marx for that matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 23 likes
Nancy Hartsock, definitely a Terf... 


Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.