And if you accept that biology is important for membership of a class of people, why doesn't it count when it comes to the difference between males and females?
Show this thread
Hang on a minute. If you're saying that trans identity is rooted in brain differences, a point which most TRAs will never accept (because what happens if a person who identifies as trans doesn't have a "trans brain"?), then that's a biological argument.https://twitter.com/PeterTatchell/status/1163776459988754432 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, structural brain differences can be acquired (famously, the enlarged hippocampus in London taxi drivers). More broadly, neural correlates of subjective experience say nothing of how ‘real’ that experience is: all subjective experiences have neural correlates.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It also doesn't account for the many people who detransition and change their mind, or the children that the Tavistock Clinic senior staff were walking out over because they felt they were being fast tracked into trans identity when they had other issues - including autisim.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Seems most people in this "discussion" don't know whether they're on foot or horse-back. Largely b/c they refuse to define their terms at the outset - foundational Too many losing sight of the diff tween the processes leading to an attribute, & the category on which it's basedpic.twitter.com/c5KGPlzhaR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.