I'm not a philosopher, so maybe this is normal for the discipline, but a lot of what I've read seems to highlight why Stock et al are wrong. There isn't an alternative theory put forward. Is this normal, to only offer critique and not put forward an alternative argument?
Why does that Justin fellow keep publishing this kind of execrable nonsense? The standard of argumentation should make all philosophers embarrassed for the profession. No wonder it's anonymous.http://dailynous.com/2019/08/06/recognizing-gender-critical-feminism-anti-trans-activism-guest-post/ …
-
-
-
I don't think any of this is normal. The intent is to render gender critical feminism verboten within the Academy. The debate isn't conducted within journals, etc, because that would be to confer legitimacy on gcf position. Plus, I suspect they suspect they'd go down in flames.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What an absolute pile of doggy doo doo (the article that is). No amount of philosophising changes the fact that the difference between men and women IS genitals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.