Philosopher Luke Roelofs, explains why gender-critical philosophy is 'transphobic', 'intellectually valueless' and 'bogus'. See what you think (I'll also link to it on my own site)https://majesticequality.wordpress.com/2019/07/25/dear-philosophers-you-can-trust-the-feminist-consensus-gender-critical-radical-feminism-is-bogus/?fbclid=IwAR32EgDB6GzknOyzCYKVigFhINOGiXMxVSPyCZOyhD8JJ7oq5kanMspKptc …
-
Show this thread
-
I've done the first part of a response here -https://medium.com/@kathleenstock/response-to-roelofs-part-one-98e8ef9a756a …
6 replies 15 retweets 63 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Docstockk
You're a bigger woman than I - I couldn't even read a third of the way through. Such motivated reasoning shouldn't take in a philosopher for a single second - extraordinary to hear that there are some falling for it.
3 replies 1 retweet 31 likes
Replying to @HJJoyceEcon @Docstockk
Are there really people falling for it!? There should be an iron law of intellectual discourse which holds that arguments are immediately discounted if the phrase "Dear philosopher" is used more than once (and once is pushing it!).
6:08 AM - 26 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.