There is, of course, no such thing as the right to have your testicles waxed. The notion is nonsense on stilts.
Show this thread
Fairly easy even from an intersectional perspective. The "right" to have your balls waxed is a positive right. The right not to be forced to wax said balls is a negative right. Negative rights trump positive rights.https://twitter.com/peterboghossian/status/1153379928621998083 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does the evangelical baker enjoy a similar negative right not to serve someone requesting a cake for a same-sex wedding?
-
(My intuitions are: cosmetician should not be forced to wax, but evangelical baker should face legal pressure to serve. But how can I have those intuitions AND parsimony?!
-
Yeah, it's difficult. My intuition is that corporate bakers should be under pressure to bake, but home bakers... not so much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.