Woah no. Cannot agree with Ellis Cashmore at all. Problem is that people aren’t competing against each other’s gender identities, they’re essentially competing against each other’s bodies. Male and female bodies are very different & that’s why they compete separately #Martina
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @DianaBellXX @serialsockthief
As a white male sociologist I can confirm he's full of shit!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @DianaBellXX
You have single handedly salvaged my respect for the sociology community
Any thoughts on where his position might come from? From an academic perspective? Or is he just a blether?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @serialsockthief @DianaBellXX
I'm guessing, but... Left-wing sociologists (and the vast majority are left-wing) are very reluctant to suppose that biology might be a factor contributing to unequal outcomes. They tend to want to believe that you can eradicate inequality by "correcting" social conditions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If you concede that ineluctable biological factors might explain the differences between male and female athletic performance then it opens up the possibility that they might be in play in other kinds of inequality.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That's dangerous territory, partly because there are echoes of scientific racism, etc., but also because it subverts the sociological modus operandi. It suggests sociologists might be looking in the wrong place for explanations, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Anyway, what this often adds up to is a knee jerk rejection of biology as a causal factor in systemic inequality. Of course, biology will often not be a factor - or only a very minor factor - but athletic performance is not one of those cases!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @DianaBellXX
That’s all really interesting. My wee brain is whirring. In some ways I’m glad I only ever skimmed the surface with basic first year sociology because I’m not convinced I would’ve survived a deeper dive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I wouldn't survive a deep dive now. But 30 years ago, I might have been tempted to make Cashmore's argument. Sociology is political & moral commitment made somewhat rigorous, and given a veneer of scientific plausibility.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.