Woah no. Cannot agree with Ellis Cashmore at all. Problem is that people aren’t competing against each other’s gender identities, they’re essentially competing against each other’s bodies. Male and female bodies are very different & that’s why they compete separately #Martina
-
-
Maybe this is a daft question but how does correction of social conditions work if you don’t also recognise material factors? The immutable conditions? The parameters you must work within? If you get what I mean, this isn’t my comfort zone.

-
Not a daft question at all. It won't work, obviously, but sociologists will likely always be able to point to additional mutable factors to explain why things aren't getting better. The moment of truth, so to speak, will be indefinitely postponed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anyway, what this often adds up to is a knee jerk rejection of biology as a causal factor in systemic inequality. Of course, biology will often not be a factor - or only a very minor factor - but athletic performance is not one of those cases!
-
That’s all really interesting. My wee brain is whirring. In some ways I’m glad I only ever skimmed the surface with basic first year sociology because I’m not convinced I would’ve survived a deeper dive.
-
I wouldn't survive a deep dive now. But 30 years ago, I might have been tempted to make Cashmore's argument. Sociology is political & moral commitment made somewhat rigorous, and given a veneer of scientific plausibility.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Any thoughts on where his position might come from? From an academic perspective? Or is he just a blether?