You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You have single handedly salvaged my respect for the sociology community 
Any thoughts on where his position might come from? From an academic perspective? Or is he just a blether?
I'm guessing, but... Left-wing sociologists (and the vast majority are left-wing) are very reluctant to suppose that biology might be a factor contributing to unequal outcomes. They tend to want to believe that you can eradicate inequality by "correcting" social conditions.
If you concede that ineluctable biological factors might explain the differences between male and female athletic performance then it opens up the possibility that they might be in play in other kinds of inequality.
That's dangerous territory, partly because there are echoes of scientific racism, etc., but also because it subverts the sociological modus operandi. It suggests sociologists might be looking in the wrong place for explanations, etc.
Maybe this is a daft question but how does correction of social conditions work if you don’t also recognise material factors? The immutable conditions? The parameters you must work within? If you get what I mean, this isn’t my comfort zone. 
Not a daft question at all. It won't work, obviously, but sociologists will likely always be able to point to additional mutable factors to explain why things aren't getting better. The moment of truth, so to speak, will be indefinitely postponed.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
