It doesn't seem close to that at all.
It really is perilously close to a conversion narrative if you suggest that lesbians ought to be open to the idea of having sex with people with penises. Sexual attraction is (almost always) embodied. It's not directed at another person's perception of their own identity.https://twitter.com/fairplaywomen/status/1137624393251733504 …
-
-
-
Why not? If you tell people they ought to be attracted to bodies of a particular sex. That's the beginning of a conversion narrative.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Crazier than shit-house rats. What tangled webs we weave when we first neglect to define our terms at the outset (sorry Will). Though a great many "scientists" & feminist "philosophers" can share the blame for that. Apropos of ...
:https://medium.com/@steersmann/reality-and-illusion-being-vs-identifying-as-77f9618b17c7 … -
Sorry, mate, but I don't think you understand how language works (even if you're sometimes right about particular issues).
-
With all due respect, I would dispute that. The people I quoted in support of my "thesis" aren't exactly chopped liver in either the philosophical or scientific domains.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s called SEXual attraction for a reason. We have SEX not gender with people. Language matters, which is why the TRAs are desperate to manipulate and monopolise it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.