If this is true, what follows from it? Suppose, for example, I discover a very persuasive argument for hard determinism. It has the consequence that many people come to believe there is no free will. https://twitter.com/Paul_Cornell/status/1135878490425888769 …
-
-
Well, it's not in the least bit clear that it means either of these things.
Show this thread -
If you're an act utilitarian you could plausibly argue that I ought to keep any such belief to myself.
Show this thread -
But it seems to me that any other meta ethical position allows me to make the argument. Certainly if we think the pursuit of truth is a virtue then I should speak up.
Show this thread -
Beliefs might have bad outcomes. Obviously that will always be a factor in any kind of moral calculus concerning when and where and how I should articulate the belief. (Normally don't tell a dying Christian there's no God).
Show this thread -
But it doesn't necessarily or straightforwardly follow that bad outcomes mean that beliefs should not be held or articulated. This is true even if the geniuses on Twitter think otherwise.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.