You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Qu 1: A person may come to feel that their gender is different from that assigned to them at birth? Well maybe, certainly seems to be the case, but so what - people come to feel all sorts of things about all sorts of things. Language - "assigned to them at birth" - is biased.
Qu 2: A person who consistently identifies in a gender which is different to the one they were assigned at birth should be accepted by society in their stated gender identity? Same biased language. Also hopelessly vague.
Accepted in what sense? In the sense that their metaphysical claims about their womanhood (for example) are treated as veridical? Accepted in the sense of not being victims of violence, etc, (well, of course). Access to women only services? What does it mean?
Qu 3. A person who consistently identifies in a gender which is different to the one they were assigned at birth should be able to access services commonly provided to the gender with which they now identify? Which services exactly? The question needs to be much more specific.
Also, the question is too blunt. It wouldn't be inconsistent for a person to think that trans women should be able to access all services provided to women, except for those which aim to mitigate against sexual trauma, male violence, etc.
Qu 4. Where access to particular services or facilities are restricted by gender, the City Corphas it in mind the restriction should relate to the gender with which the service user consistently identifies now, regardless of whether that is the gender they were assigned at birth.
Oh for God's sake, that question is ridiculously hard to parse. People are just going to respond "Agree" because they lose the will to live reading it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
