Maybe because we're not stroking off while fantasizing about mass murder? Just a thoughthttps://twitter.com/PhilosophyExp/status/1130799409753726976 …
-
When Hitler was first building the Nazi party he would deliberately stick posters up announcing meetings in communist areas, because he knew it would provoke confrontation. You people think you'll win any battle on the streets, but it's a high risk strategy. What if you don't?
The best defence against the encroachment of fascism is strong institutions of political and civil society. You undermine that by playing your macho political games. Antifa are narcissistic political children playing a game they don't understand.
-
-
Yeah, no. To pick just one example: Mosley's British Union of Fascists—which had friends in many of those very "institutions of political and civil society" you mention—was eventually defeated not by civil debate but by bloody street fighting.
-
So don't presume to lecture me about an "ahistorical" worldview. You may not like direct action, but it works. Indeed, history shows it's about the only thing that does.
-
History doesn't show any such thing. Here's an article from the Daily Mail from 1923 (I think). Check out the section of the Fascisti Martyrs. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vS4YK5r7W7c3c0OWVVYUNaMXM/view?usp=sharing … Sorry, but don't know enough to make this conversation worthwhile.
-
And I weep hot, bitter tears in the face of your disapproval. You fight the fash your way, I'll fight in mine; when this is all over, we can argue about who did it "properly."
-
Unless of course the Fash win, in which case... see you in Hell!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.