I worked as a care assistant for a year or two (partly) looking after kids with severe autism. I often think autism activists have absolutely no clue just how profoundly disabling & destructive the condition can be.
Probably my experience skewed right towards the severest end of the range of issues that can come with autism. I think this particular lad was probably in "sensory hell" the whole time. If I had to guess. No verbal language, only very little non-verbal.
-
-
Right. Hence the
@NAT_taskforce recommendations, starting with: 'Carry out regular sensory reviews of environments where autistic clients spend time, utilising the expertise of autistic people to identify sensory issues.'https://nationalautistictaskforce.org.uk/an-independent-guide-to-quality-care-for-autistic-people/#section4 … -
You cannot begin to imagine - actually possibly you can - how far way we were from implementing this sort of thing. It was a long time ago though.
-
I can imagine, although it's EXTREMELY UNCOMFORTABLE to do so, so I try not to! A lot of people still just don't know where to start making environments acceptable for autistic people. I think of
@sbaroncohen mentioning those who 'appear to be in anguish for no apparent reason'. -
This was the mid-1990s. I think we had an idea that sensory overload (as we would have seen it) was the most immediate problem. But absolutely no way to control it. No resources. No staff. Other (non-autistic) profoundly disabled kids for whom we cared. No power.
-
I think the lad was probably in hell - and I thought so at the time - but even now, not sure given the particular circumstances, what more we actually could have done. I don't want to think about it too closely either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.