The Myth of Partisan Grading! There's been a lot of talk lately about self-censorship on campus. According to one popular theory, conservative students censor themselves because they believe that if they state their true views, they will get a lower grade. This theory is true.
-
Show this thread
-
By which I mean that it IS the case that conservative students believe this. I know offhand of two surveys confirming it. A 2017
@TheFIREorg survey shows conservatives report self-censoring in the classroom more than liberals, especially at the extreme ends of the spectrum.pic.twitter.com/kczQ5VrKgg
2 replies 34 retweets 271 likesShow this thread -
And when asked why, conservatives are more likely to say they have self-censored due to fear of receiving a lower grade from their professor. Source [Tables 12 and 13]: https://www.thefire.org/publications/student-surveys/student-attitudes-free-speech-survey/ …pic.twitter.com/LZQljm7yWe
8 replies 15 retweets 182 likesShow this thread -
Similar findings were reported in a 2017
@HdxAcademy survey, which added a question about which TOPICS generate self-censorship. Again, conservatives were more likely to self-censor due to fear of a bad grade. https://heterodoxacademy.org/the-fearless-speech-index-who-is-afraid-to-speak-and-why/ …pic.twitter.com/5vsi5p3ETa
4 replies 12 retweets 164 likesShow this thread -
OK, what does this mean? Well, it means that there's a significant percentage of conservative students (about 10%, according to FIRE) who believe that if they express their genuine opinions in class, they will be penalized by their professors. But guess what? They're wrong.
21 replies 106 retweets 470 likesShow this thread -
We have a couple studies looking at this exact issue. An experiment by Musgrave and Rom (2015) had polisci students compose two essays, one on the history and beliefs of the Democratic Party and another on the GOP. These were then given to TAs to grade.https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications/78/ …
8 replies 28 retweets 280 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @JeffreyASachs
The TAs knew their marking was going to be looked at, and with the first batch of essays they were sent questions about their political partisanship & ideology (should have been done afterwards!). Both those things are real problems (as is the fact they were TAs not full profs).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @JeffreyASachs
The questions we asked the TAs were standard survey questions. To misdirect the TAs, we asked them to guess the sex of the students, hoping they would believe the study was about sex bias.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkCarlRom @JeffreyASachs
I understand that. But the fact they were being studied at all, & knew it, is a huge confounding variable. Plus, they're presumably not naive. Your misdirection might well have been perceived as precisely that. I'd have realized. I accept, of course, not easy to control all this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @JeffreyASachs
Yeah, this topic is pretty difficult to study. For example....if we were to redo it, addressing the concerns of our critics, we'd have to conceal *our* identify -- so that the subjects wouldn't say "Oh, Rom and
@profmusgrave ....they must be studying political bias..."1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah, it's really difficult. I don't think your conclusions are necessarily wrong. It's just... you know.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.