Although, as I always say, whether the original statement or your "quine" meta version, this just shifts the debate to "what counts as evidence?"
Therefore, it would be morally wrong to believe that believing without evidence is always morally wrong (unless one has seen the evidence - i.e., understands the argument - that results in this conclusion).https://twitter.com/philosophybites/status/1059419142879625216 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is true if you use what I regard as evidence but false otherwise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.