1. Having been the victim of sexual assault/rape. 2. Body image problems (including gender dysphoria). 3. Vaginismus - look it up if you don't know what it is.
-
Show this thread
-
4. Recent heart attack. 5. Flattened affect (e.g., people suffering from a depressive disorder). 6. Feelings of guilt and/or disgust about sex.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
7. A history of bad sexual experiences. 8. Religious conservatism, and the worry that god might be watching. 9. Feelings of guilt about sexual orientation.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
10. Performance anxiety. 11. Erectile dysfunction. 12. Premature ejaculation.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
13. Fear of pregnancy. 14. Fear of being caught or heard (e.g., parents of young children). 15. Stress, tiredness, illness.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
All of these things might make enthusiastic consent problematic. None of them rule out the possibility of informed consent. It doesn't matter how "woke", or how American, you are - you don't get to tell people they have to be enthusiastic about the things to which they consent.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Of course, I'm entirely aware that enthusiasm is a good signal of consent - though actually not an infallible signal - but the problem arises because of the elision of signal and necessary condition.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Enthusiasm as a standard rules out encounters where consent comes from pressure, eg your boss demands sex (and maybe they'll fire you if you refuse). What do you think of this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StruanCurtis
It's not required. There is already the principle that you shouldn't pressure somebody to have sex with you...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
So it's basically redundant then. But what if one person feels greatly pressured and the other one is blissfully unaware of that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
For ethical sexual practices there is the requirement for a certain amount of vigilance with regards to your partner's feelings, desires (or lack thereof), etc. If your ignorance is because you're not paying sufficient regard, then you're not acting ethically.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
So, consent is consent, enthusiastic or otherwise, but there are other ethically significant things to consider too. (eg, are they acting out of character due to intoxication). But that's a different conversation.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.