I shouldn't have to say it, but I will for the avoidance of doubt. I'm not saying the headline claim is incorrect. Just that the methodology adopted in this article is ridiculous, absurd, farcical, ludicrous, bonkers and nutty.
Show this thread
Good god this article is wildly daft. You can't say, well, we have no good data, the best data is utterly hopeless (as it is in this case), but we're going to use it anyway.https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-men-are-more-likely-to-be-raped-than-be-falsely-accused-of-rape …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally agree, the data here has to be approached with caution (and often isn’t).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.