Jeremy Stangroom Retweeted Kate Manne
No, because it will turn out the notion of being "trans-inclusive" necessarily involves accepting the further claim that trans women are women, & that kind of ontological claim cannot be settled by an appeal to consequences (in this case, the consequences of not being inclusive).https://twitter.com/kate_manne/status/1018565180886790149 …
Jeremy Stangroom added,
Kate Manne @kate_manne
The pain of social humiliation that attend trans folks' very being in social space given an omnipresent risk of being misgendered, mispronouned, or deadnamed, not to mention the high risk of subsequent physical and sexual violence, provides decisive reasons to be trans-inclusive.
Show this thread
1:59 AM - 16 Jul 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.