Jeremy Stangroom

FWIW, my take on Scruton's conservatism: 1. Yeah, Edmund Burke is pretty much right about the dangers of top down change motivated by a political philosophy derived from first principles. (I've thought that for years.)

2. Scruton is right about the abject failure of the revolutionary/socialist left to say anything at all of any substance about the nature of an emancipated post-revolutionary society. (It's a joke, frankly.)

3. Scruton is right to emphasize the importance of the rule of law as a protection against the tyranny of the state (and corporate bodies). Check out how The Times reacted (in 1819) to the Peterloo massacre - it's a fabulous illustration of the importance of the law.

4. But he's way too sanguine about the horrors, both extant and historical, of Western societies. Nothing about grinding poverty, absent life chances, exploitative labour practices, etc.

5. His idea that human beings need to cultivate the spiritual side of their nature in order to escape the vapidities of consumerist society is utterly unconvincing. Not going to to work, mate, that's even assuming we have a spiritual aspect (which we don't).

I can't see that it's that bad. Scruton's emphasis is on the sacred, esp. as intimated through high art, rather than specific religious doctrines. He is more subtle than you think. But I agree with some of your other criticisms.

Twitter doesn't allow for nuance! But my point stands - you're not going to mitigate the effects of rampant consumerism simply be telling people they need to change their lives. It needs to be top-down (if you want it to work).

I suspect reform of the curricula of schools and universities might be high on his agenda here. Not sure if that counts as 'top-down' though. And abolish pop music and porn...