This is where standpoint theory inevitably ends up - identity becomes an epistemological trump card. (And this is why standpoint theory is not postmodern, because postmodernism allows no grounds to privilege one standpoint over another).https://twitter.com/lillydancyger/status/1008838121197273088 …
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
It's true that most standpoint theorists argue that standpoint theory is objectivist, ie, that there are social facts, and that people who occupy subordinated social positions have privileged epistemic access to the unjust social reality in which they are subordinated.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyVicendese @PhilosophyExp
They also claim that members of groups that are privileged have an epistemic disadvantage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmilyVicendese @PhilosophyExp
The worry here, ofc, is how do you justify your claim your group is subordinated and therefore epistemically privileged, if we are all susceptible to these epistemic limitations? It seems to me we need an objective standpoint outside standpoints to evaluate competing claims.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I've written about this exact issue: http://www.philosophersmag.com/opinion/7-the-antinomies-of-privilege …
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.