My view is that it's normal for left-wing intellectuals to think that people on the right are deeply immoral - bigoted in various ways, etc. I think it's rarer for conservative intellectuals to think that people on the left are deeply immoral.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @Metakosmia
Many on the right subscribe to some form of natural law and do indeed belive that leftists are immoral for advocating a redistribution of wealth
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen_jhudson @Metakosmia
Hmmm. 1) Some on the right think this way; 2) I don't think it's true that conservatives of Scruton's ilk are just as likely to think their moderate opponents are evil as leftists (see how Twitter Tankies view centrists, for example).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @Metakosmia
Agree about twitter tankies seeing those on the right and centre as evil. But are they not a small (but vocal) minority of leftists?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen_jhudson @Metakosmia
Do you not think the student Left, for example, tends to think political moderation is indicative of moral failing? Difficult because it depends on what one means by left, centrist, right, moderate, etc - for example, conservatives can disagree fundamentally with neo-liberals.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @Metakosmia
Yes, but student politics in general tends towards high passions and more extreme opinions. Haven't read Scruton's book, but just read a review that claims he portrays Gyorgy Lukacs as 'downright wicked'! Will have to read the book...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen_jhudson @Metakosmia
Okay, but there are a lot of students, and as a proportion of left activists, they're not insignificant (think Paris 1968). Lukacs - well he was an apologist for Stalin (despite having been imprisoned by Stalin!).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @Metakosmia
Also, from the review I mentioned (the Guardian): 'Just like his communist-minded opponents, then, Scruton seems to think exclusively in terms of an embattled “us” versus a homogenous “them”.'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Stephen_jhudson @Metakosmia
Is that Poole? If so, bollox. Scruton says book is a provocation, but he goes out of his way to flag up what is good in the works of its subjects. He clearly admires Thomspon, Foucault, Adorno, Sartre - & does his best to make sense of the writings of even those he doesn't admire
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @Metakosmia
It's clearly not a sympathetic review. I'll have to read the book. Poole also claims Scruton indulges in the paranoid right-wing fantasy of a leftist conspiracy in to silence right wing voices. If so, rather silly of him..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, I'm sure there's no conspiracy as such, but Scruton's conservatism resulted in angry letters to his publisher & university department from fellow academics saying he wasn't fit for purpose (which is ridiculous, because he's clearly a perfectly able & respectable academic).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.