Don't be silly. It's entirely possible to think violence is only justified in the most extreme circumstances, that it should only ever be a matter of last resort, and to be entirely opposed to gender critical feminism.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Don't move the goalposts - not going to work. Your claim was quite explicit: If you're not totally appalled by *all* violence, and you're offended by punch a TERF, then you're a TERF. And that - as is obvious - is a ridiculous, laughable position.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
I tell you what else, mate - it also manifests the arrogance of a white man. Are you really telling trans people who are disturbed by "punch a TERF" rhetoric, but who think it's justified to fight off a rapist, that they're TERFs? Really? You want to go down that road?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
And what's more I don't need many trans people to make my point. One or two - and you're calling them TERFs, Arrogant. And total, intersectional fail. (You feel this conversation is going well for you, because I'm quite happy to stop.)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
But that's a different claim. Plus it's self-selecting again, in the other direction - towards the activist gender critical pole. And really, you can't really blame these women for their reaction. You're suggesting it's legitimate to punch them, aren't you?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
I asked you a question, twit! It was a question. That's what that squiggly thing is on the end of the sentence. Plus, mate, take it from me - it's very easy to read your tweet as an endorsement.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.