Seriously? If I think that a woman being raped is justified in using reasonable force to fight off a rapist, but I'm offended by "punch a TERF", then I'm self-identifying as a TERF. That's your position? Really? Seriously?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Don't be silly. It's entirely possible to think violence is only justified in the most extreme circumstances, that it should only ever be a matter of last resort, and to be entirely opposed to gender critical feminism.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Don't move the goalposts - not going to work. Your claim was quite explicit: If you're not totally appalled by *all* violence, and you're offended by punch a TERF, then you're a TERF. And that - as is obvious - is a ridiculous, laughable position.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
I tell you what else, mate - it also manifests the arrogance of a white man. Are you really telling trans people who are disturbed by "punch a TERF" rhetoric, but who think it's justified to fight off a rapist, that they're TERFs? Really? You want to go down that road?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
And what's more I don't need many trans people to make my point. One or two - and you're calling them TERFs, Arrogant. And total, intersectional fail. (You feel this conversation is going well for you, because I'm quite happy to stop.)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
But that's a different claim. Plus it's self-selecting again, in the other direction - towards the activist gender critical pole. And really, you can't really blame these women for their reaction. You're suggesting it's legitimate to punch them, aren't you?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.