Yes, but your claim isn't that it was inspired by postmodernism - it was that it is recognisably postmodernist. That makes a difference.
-
For you, it's a label that designates a set of ideas and positions that don't necessarily cohere together, but which are dominant at this particular historical juncture. I think there are dangers in seeing it your way. You think my way misses the point!
Sounds interesting. I have absolutely no problem with tracing the evolution of ideas, etc., through their intellectual development, etc - and looking at how certain sorts of position (e.g., relativism) end in disaster.
