His subsequent tweet comes a bit closer to postmodernism, with its talk of floating signifiers, but actually what he's saying isn't stupid - it's just the ridiculous, embarrassing language gets in the way of the sensible point he's making.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think they are misunderstanding him as saying that "health doesn't really exist because woo", when I read him as saying something more like "the diet and fitness industry is full of woo dressed up as commodities dressed up as personal responsibility"
-
Yeah, he's saying something like the fitness industry is selling the idea that you can self-actualize, etc., if you're able to look at your own health & fitness as a rational project that can be furthered via the products of the fitness industry.
-
And that the evidence doesn't support these kinds of diets work (which is an empirical claim), but also that these kinds of projects tend to encourage neo-liberalism by centering the focus on individual achievement, excellence, etc., which inevitably adds a moral dimension.
-
None of which is postmodern - or obviously stupid. The language is stupid, but the idea has merit, and is worthy of consideration, even if it turns out to be wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.