That a colourblind neuroscientists couldn't work out, from the relevant neuroscience, what it's like to see red. From which it follows that the purely quantitative language of neuroscience can't capture the qualities of subjective experience.
-
-
I've written a book or two on the topic to be fair
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
That's easy. The knowledge argument points to the self-evident fact that experience is inherently
#subjective. We can't know another's subjective experience. That's an argument against physicalism. It doesn't support#panpsychism's assumption that#consciousness is fundamental. -
I agree with that. I argue for panpsychism on the basis that it's the best explanation of the correlations between consciousness and brain activity known through neuroscience. But an important part of that case is ruling out materialism via the knowledge argument.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If *anyone* can provide evidence of *anything* not physical (energymatterinformation), please present it and wait for a probable Nobel and ~$1million! ;-)
-
colours, smells, sounds, . .oh yes . .and consciousness itself.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The existence of the sensory order (Edelman, 1982; Hayek, 1952) does not entail panpsychism, and as Joaquin Fuster, Edelman, and Hayek emphasize, the whole enchilada is getting the problem right, and in part that takes not getting the explanation wrong.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I don't see how the faculty of judgment should be construed as part of a causal series, we are not mental robots, and computers will never "think"
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
1. I've presented multiple arguments and it seems you've either not read them or you've not understood what I've said. Here's the summary for those who keep liking your reply without reading the counter argument. Maybe they'll respond.
-
2. No description of the functional sensing of color using words, math, or programming language can communicate how to respond to a sensory input. No skill can be transferred to a human or a general skill based robot this way. Both must calibrate with experience.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.