Trade talks looking like they will get ugly. Brussels is prepared to fight dirtyhttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/01/brexit-trade-talks-eu-to-back-spain-over-gibraltar-claims?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_WhatsApp …
-
-
The demands on the UK far more rigorous than Canada http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/29f642d4-4448-11ea-a083-1ec392b38124 …pic.twitter.com/UT6dsJxJBL
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The closer and more integrated the market, the higher the bar for any trade deal. That’s always been the case and formally so for at least two years.
-
It’s easier economically to do a trade deal if the markets are aligned. So it’s a political decision to make everyone poorer if we don’t. Also that argument suggests if we go to WTO on jan 1 2021 we can then negotiate a Canada deal, which is just bonkers logic
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I do wonder why anyone thought giving up our votes in the EU and insulting them for decades beforehand would result in them putting our interests before their own at this stage in proceedings.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You/the U.K. Gov cannot seriously have thought that the CETA trade deal (all 1200 pages of it) could simply be applied to the U.K., with “Canada” rubbed out and the U.K. inserted, given the balance of trade - the goods and services sold- are so markedly different in their impact
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Welcome to the rest of the world... where the EU uses its massive leverage to force states with smaller economies into worse off one-sided deals. Especially those that set up an absurd time table for negotiations
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I don't think "reasonableness" is really a thing in international politics. Welcome to being an isolated third country.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Presumably sovereignty is two sided. The EU too can do what it chooses. It has no obligation to be consistent, just to do what is in its interests. Why is that so unreasonable?
-
Of course both sides can choose to do what they want. But why give a country you do little trade with better terms than one you do most of your trade with (uk equivalent to us for Eu27 trade)? That is deliberately punishing your own people.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They don’t negotiate in good faith. They are not a rules based or consistent operator, nor a pragmatic one. Thank god we’re out.
-
They always revert to form don’t they. Negotiating with the EU is so formulaic. They will only start to bend at the 11th hour. Meanwhile, to hell with the economic consequences - uncertainty and reduced investment - at a time when both sides of the Channel need it most.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.