Space used for 72 people using cars (auto), bus, bikes (fahrrad).
Taken from #36c3 #urban #mobility. High density low distance areas like cities cannot afford cars.pic.twitter.com/QmQFpHuDwY
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Do you know that bus is often more expensive and has more pollution per passenger than car?
I agree that busses today are not "green". They take up to 50l / 100 km. But since they are a lot more populated than the average car which is only 1.1 to 1.3 people per car they even win this battle. Utilisation is the main car problem. In terms of space and emissions.
We often were only two when I went by bus to my work. State pays bus company to keep unprofitable lines. In more crowded areas it makes sense, but IMHO only without state/city intervention. CNG (compressed natural gas) engines have pollution comparable to gasoline, which is good.
The point I wanted to make was the space used and wasted by cars. Which is even worse in dense areas like cities. I fully agree that there needs to be something done to replace current engines. Also in busses.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.