Glen Peters

@Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden question: is "negative emissions before 2030" an inside joke, or are you being sarcastic, & poking fun at COP21?

@FernandoLeanme Well, the negative emission technologies (e.g., BECCS) would have to be already at scale in 2030... @Oliver_Geden

@Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden they will need Supermen w/engineering degree and significant experience in mega magic. Or are we being sarcastic?

@FernandoLeanme @Oliver_Geden We need something like that, yes.

@Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden geoengineering @ massive scale may be doable, but I would need a 40 year R&D & pilot phases before I can endorse.

@FernandoLeanme @Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden there's a BECCS science proved, scalable and cost effective #biogasdoneright and #soil Cseq(1/2)

@BozzettoStefano @Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden the lack of knowledge about engineering, planning, cost estimating & economics is evident.

@FernandoLeanme @Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden NOT about our experience . There are more than 1200 biogas plant in work at farms gate

@Peters_Glen hi Glen, can you provide the source for these charts please?

@SebHenbest I made them based on the quota in IPCC AR5 Synthesis Table 2.2

.@Peters_Glen reveals the silent partner in the Paris Agreement. Negative emissions are simply conjured up as our Dr Strangelove saviour

@Peters_Glen @clv101 yes, it's not about sustainable growth. It's about a sustainable retreat.

@CycleSystemsAc @Peters_Glen @clv101 Luckily, when you're in retreat, the law of diminishing returns is on your side.