Looking at this curve, I do not see any evidence that we have already avoided the worst pathways (4 or 5C by 2100). Am i missing sg?
@GlobalEcoGuy twitter.com/tomasldb/statu
This Tweet is unavailable.
28
140
343
Conversation
I think it is easier to see trends in the emissions than in the concentrations (the latter is kind of an integral of the former). Historically, emissions have been increasing. But in the 5-6 years, emissions seem to have stabilised a bit (CO2; combining EDGAR and GCP data).
3
3
6
well, it might be easier but I just do not so fully trust it that we are aware of all of our emissions... aren't there many that noone knows or not notices (we noticed the NorthStream leak, but what if it was in Syberia...?) or just not so honestly reported...?
1
1
This is why we have a & do things like the carbon budget, CH4 budget, and N2O budget!
globalcarbonproject.org
Right, but just because we have a project that does not necessarily mean we already know everything.. eg from syberian gas leaks to uncertainties about soil uptake/emissions, etc?
1
1
Show replies