This is a start but the scenario illustrated is highly unlikely
The hope is that Biden-Harris will be able to implement policies to put the US on a trajectory for net-zero emissions in 2050 (only CO₂ shown here). This is ambitious, the more so given there are new Presidential elections every 4 years (vertical red lines). Time to start...pic.twitter.com/2UYv05mQ5E
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
People on this thread might find the following of interest- https:http://www.nationalreview.com/2020/09/u-k-net-zero-emissions-target-costly-little-gain …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
...and given that ideally the US, along with the EU and other developed countries, should ideally go to
#netzero sooner than 2050 in order to allow more time for the Global South... -
Net Zero in 2050 means much more than the allowed 300 Gt world wide. I hate the message of 2050. We need a reduction by 40%-50% in 2025.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Establish a bipartisan Department of Climate and appoint a Climate Czar! Should be same structure as DoE or DoL. The key here is balancing aggressive climate action (which historically has been progressive) with bringing good-faith conservatives to the solutions table
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
What will happen to the trillion+ tonnes of CO2 already emitted that will remain in the air for centuries? That first and lethal dose of CO2 humanity has forced down Mother Nature's throat, why do you think not killing her twice with a second lethal dose is so important?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The question is more : how much of this CO2 emission decline will be achieved via human will and how much by geological constraints (peak oil) ?
-
Peak oil would *increase* emissions - if anything - because enormous coal and tar deposits are available that can be turned into synthetic oil and oil products at relatively low cost ($60/boe) but with additional CO2 emissions.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
They urgently need to address the fake "green" antinuclearism within the Democratic Party, which is responsible for the ongoing failure to price carbon in the US ("because that would benefit nuclear") and sabotage of the US domestic civilian nuclear energy supply.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.