Interesting. Shipping growth looks high since IMO estimated a peak in emissions in 2008. Do you know why the difference? Our bottom up analysis here — currently working on 2016-2018 for the IMO 4th GHG study. https://theicct.org/publications/GHG-emissions-global-shipping-2013-2015 …
-
-
-
We have used IEA statistics here. CEDS (based on IMO) is much higher, & very different growth. I am not sure how much effort has gone into understanding the IEA vs IMO differences. We have looked a bit, but written nothing (I am sure others have dug, you know links?)pic.twitter.com/jQFmyDUMBB
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
China, India and other developing countries are the elephants in the room as they are building over 1,000 coal power plants over the next 30 years.pic.twitter.com/vgGLeYVugy
-
Also this is because of OUR (western) consumption. They're making stuff for US, and you appear to making THEM the baddies. Nah...
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Would be good to see this graph in CO2e. And of course, much of the elephant is easy to electrify!
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It's more like "not grow as quickly" than to reduce. There are no policies for reducing international aviation emissions in absolute terms. Can the same be said about land transport? I assume it includes freight?
-
Here's the IEA breakdown.https://twitter.com/AarneGranlund/status/1218085331448291329 …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Right, but last 3 years aviation is +5%/y plus contrails=*2
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Probably the easiest to correct in terms of freight. Rail + Electric light trucks delivering out of transport hubs. Or better still, localised manufacturing.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.