Shouldn't a) be a 1.5 C path? Couldn't see the article.
Global mitigation "rules" (eg Carbon Law, halving emissions every decade), are nice & catchy, but they mask the mitigation challenge facing developing countries. Currently, it is virtually impossible for developing countries to meet these rules... https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018EF001078 …pic.twitter.com/ecftHBVbYv
-
-
-
Ivaylo: Both <2C but (a) is negligible development of engineered C sinks and land use change while (c) includes massive engineered C sinks. Seems obvious capitalism needs to end and national emergencies declared... somehow? Show is over.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
"Global Rules Mask the Mitigation Challenge Facing Developing Countries" Could easily argue they mask the challenge facing developed countries too, since to allow for pathways missing rules, others must significantly exceed them. Same goes for sectors, not just countries.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.