Yes, you would.
-
-
Replying to @PeterSjostedt1 @ThoughtSlime and
Ah so you're brave enough to shitpost, but to cowardly to out right state your issue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bellaj0713 @ThoughtSlime and
Go through the full thread. I presume that you have the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @PeterSjostedt1 @ThoughtSlime and
No mine was a question to clarify your stance, it's your refusal that makes me call out the cowardice of stating something then refusing to say what you mean when asked. 0 presumption for me dear.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bellaj0713 @ThoughtSlime and
Could you clarify your perceived stance. I'd just rather cut to the quick.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterSjostedt1 @ThoughtSlime and
My perceived stance is you made a vague condescending statement and I'd like to understand your meaning. However when asked to clarify suddenly your worried about word policing and assumptions. Which only makes me further wish you were alpha enough to say it with your chest boy
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bellaj0713 @ThoughtSlime and
Ok. I'm confused. You want me to verify an explicit stance? That you won't state? What can I rubber stamp for you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterSjostedt1 @ThoughtSlime and
" And warning to those following, do not click on all profile pictures without being prepared for surprises. " I assumed asking in this tweet meant it's what I wanted you to elaborate in, but all you wanna do is circle jerk.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So, you are drawing a direct statement from don't click on profile pictures? Is that it? Would you like that clarified?
-
-
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.