Ridiculous to make such a definitive statement with 0 evidence and plenty of circumstantial evidence against.
And we're in agreement: SARS-2 coronavirus has natural origins, was not produced through GOF research, and probably has nothing to do with the Wuhan Institute of VIrologyhttps://twitter.com/Quicktake/status/1409368088320122880 …
1:31
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
-
Investigation and transparency needed. Having said that natural outbreak is more likely. What I want to know is how many coronavirus outbreaks China hid from the world
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People under estimate the power of nature and evolution.
-
People also under estimate the power of Chinese money
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Without a comprehensive and open sharing of information on the part of the Chinese government, this is all noise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok ask her if she knows the scientists who conducted their work at BSL-2. If she does not know, then we cannot assume that her perspective is ALL the perspective because those that work at BSL-2 has published paper.
-
Please cite the paper and the evidence that the research it contains was conducted in a BSL-2 facility, thanks.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.